There’s been a lot going on with Star Wars Battlefront II in recent days, so we thought the best way to tell you about it was to give us an honest trailer.
Star Wars Battlefront II
Best comments
I didn’t like the review, the game was given a pass and I didn’t understand why as someone who didn’t play. I still don’t understand why the game is good and what’s bad, it’s funny that they decided to parody the “Honest Trailer”, but damn it’s not in the review. In short, I’m waiting for a normal text review.
Worst review of the year.
This is, of course, funny and fun, but nothing is clear about the game at all. Apart from sarcasm and whining about loot boxes, and a couple of jokes about the campaign – nothing. I’m not defending Battlefront, I’m just saying that there is zero valuable information in the review. And then there was no need to call it a review, they would have posted it as a separate material.
A downvoted comment criticizing a review of really poor quality? I don’t believe my eyes. I completely agree with you, friend.
And in this case, the really boring format of the Honest Trailer was thrown out of topic. This could have been left as an episodic rofl, leaving room for a serious analysis of the game, its changes compared to the first part. The game is not worth attention because of a donation in a paid game? AND IN ADDITION TO LOOTBOXES THERE WILL BE CRITICISM, PEOPLE? How do you all know that EA will not be removed or at least nerfed by the next patches?? Actually, she is now under a lot of pressure from the public and the gaming community. And if they do this in the end and it turns out that the SG review turned out to be simply nothing for the gamer, since he was not told any meaningful information about the game in the review.
P.S.
Where were all of you https://galsportbettingcasino.co.uk/ guys upvoting the comment above and criticizing the review three years ago, when 4 years ago Maxos threw the audience a three-minute video review of GRID 2 (https://stopgame.ru/show/49189/grid_2_videoreview)? Yes, Galperova was also given a video review of SUPER HOT for the SG, but this is almost an isolated case, although the quality of the SG review after one jumps from serviceability to complete mediocrity for a long time.
Something seems to me to have been re-created. This is not a review at all, since there is no analysis or analysis of the components of the game or a story about personal impressions. But here there is a hodgepodge of superficial complaints about the game, which any schoolchild could come up with by looking at the news headlines about the game. If this were a separate video, no complaints, except that it wasn’t funny to me, although in theory it should have been, but that might be my problem.
As it were, the game is not such an unambiguous piece of shit, because on metacritic there are about 70 critics (viewers lowered the rating below 1, but these are all loot boxes), Kostyan liked the campaign, and his nemesis Anton generally enjoyed the game.
So there was something to discuss, it seems to me. But you decided to make a funny story in one evening (at least that’s what it looks like) and you don’t give a damn, which is a pity.
Funny, creative, but just one question:
Let’s say I’m a person who doesn’t care about loot boxes and loves sound. Suppose I want to buy a game for the sake of multiplayer, while having previously played the previous part and Battlefield. What disadvantages or advantages of the game will I understand from the review??
The video is funny as a local review, but if I really have a question about purchasing and leveling up for internal currency is not terrible for me, how should I look at the game? I really don’t understand whether she’s good, bad, corny funny, interesting. Are the maps and modes good?. Most reviews focus on the company and loot boxes. All. Everyone seems to be ignoring why people even think about buying a game in the first place.
Doing such a review is somehow unprofessional or something?. Even reviews of outright garbage on SG were full of reasoned criticism with a full analysis of the pros and cons. And here we get 2-3 offers for each disadvantage of the game, although it also has advantages. In addition, I’m wondering why Alexandra didn’t voice the review herself, but entrusted it to Maxim. After all, she is the main author.
I nod furiously to this gentleman. Aimlessly wasted four minutes of my life on some very controversial attempts at humor without specifics.
History repeats itself with another review from Sasha, Little Nightmares, it seems. I decided to take an example from Celebro and get creative, but I couldn’t combine creativity and information in one video.
So where is the actual video review??
Guys can create a striking contrast on the site. An insanely creative video for Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus sits next to… this. I realize that the video was made for the sake of poking fun at the game, but it feels somewhat belated when all the jokes have long been joked, barbs said and generally scattered across the Internet. Don’t take it as arrogance or rudeness, but these 5 minutes were simply thrown into the trash, they are useless. If this is a prelude to something more in terms of review, then I take it back. Otherwise, well, it was possible to combine constructiveness with funny jokes for 10-15 minutes.
At first I saw that the video was 5 minutes long. I thought that they would cut up the review and force me to pay for the full version. Glad that’s not the case 🙂
In general, get rid of these meaningless random video inserts. I’m already sick of them, just because they’re being shoved everywhere doesn’t mean you should too, you’re ruining the integrity and mood of the entire video with them.